Re: [PATCH 4.4 017/192] [PATCH 017/135] clk: xgene: Fix divider with non-zero shift value

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Tue Sep 20 2016 - 07:40:01 EST


On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 18:58 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> [ Upstream commit 1382ea631ddddb634850a3795527db0feeff5aaf ]
>
> The X-Gene clock driver missed the divider shift operation when
> set the divider value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Loc Ho <lho@xxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 308964caeebc ("clk: Add APM X-Gene SoC clock driver")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c
> @@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ static int xgene_clk_set_rate(struct clk
> /* Set new divider */
> data = xgene_clk_read(pclk->param.divider_reg +
> pclk->param.reg_divider_offset);
> - data &= ~((1 << pclk->param.reg_divider_width) - 1);
> + data &= ~((1 << pclk->param.reg_divider_width) - 1)
> + << pclk->param.reg_divider_shift;
[...]

This still does the wrong thing when the shift value is non-zero: it
clears all bits to the right of the divider field in data. I think the
correct assignment is:

data &= ~(((1 << pclk->param.reg_divider_width) - 1)
<< pclk->param.reg_divider_shift);

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.