Re: [PATCH] [media] omap3isp: don't call of_node_put

From: Laurent Pinchart
Date: Fri Sep 30 2016 - 04:52:34 EST


Hello Nikolaus,

On Friday 30 Sep 2016 10:28:40 H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> > Am 29.09.2016 um 10:54 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > On Thursday 08 Sep 2016 17:48:33 H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> >> of_node_put() has already been called inside
> >> of_graph_get_next_endpoint().
> >>
> >> Otherwise we may get warnings like
> >>
> >> [ 10.118286] omap3isp 480bc000.isp: parsing endpoint
> >> /ocp/isp@480bc000/ports/port@0/endpoint, interface 0 [ 10.118499]
> >> ERROR:
> >> Bad of_node_put() on /ocp/isp@480bc000/ports/port@0/endpoint [
> >> 10.118499]
> >> CPU: 0 PID: 968 Comm: udevd Not tainted 4.7.0-rc4-letux+ #376 [
> >> 10.118530] Hardware name: Generic OMAP36xx (Flattened Device Tree) [
> >> 10.118560] [<c010f0e0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010b6d8>]
> >> (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 10.118591] [<c010b6d8>] (show_stack) from
> >> [<c03ecc50>] (dump_stack+0x98/0xd0) [ 10.118591] [<c03ecc50>]
> >> (dump_stack) from [<c03eecac>] (kobject_release+0x60/0x74) [ 10.118621]
> >> [<c03eecac>] (kobject_release) from [<c05ab128>]
> >> (__of_get_next_child+0x40/0x48) [ 10.118652] [<c05ab128>]
> >> (__of_get_next_child) from [<c05ab158>] (of_get_next_child+0x28/0x44) [
> >> 10.118652] [<c05ab158>] (of_get_next_child) from [<c05ab350>]
> >> (of_graph_get_next_endpoint+0xe4/0x124) [ 10.118804] [<c05ab350>]
> >> (of_graph_get_next_endpoint) from [<bf1c88a4>] (isp_probe+0xdc/0xd80
> >> [omap3_isp]) [ 10.118896] [<bf1c88a4>] (isp_probe [omap3_isp]) from
> >> [<c0482008>] (platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0) [ 10.118927] [<c0482008>]
> >> (platform_drv_probe) from [<c04800e8>] (driver_probe_device+0x134/0x29c)
> >> [
> >> 10.118957] [<c04800e8>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c04802d8>]
> >> (__driver_attach+0x88/0xac) [ 10.118957] [<c04802d8>] (__driver_attach)
> >> from [<c047e7b8>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x6c/0x90) [ 10.118957]
> >> [<c047e7b8>]
> >> (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c047f798>] (bus_add_driver+0xcc/0x1e8) [
> >> 10.118988] [<c047f798>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c0481228>]
> >> (driver_register+0xac/0xf4) [ 10.118988] [<c0481228>] (driver_register)
> >> from [<c010192c>] (do_one_initcall+0xac/0x154) [ 10.119018]
> >> [<c010192c>]
> >> (do_one_initcall) from [<c02015bc>] (do_init_module+0x58/0x39c) [
> >> 10.119049] [<c02015bc>] (do_init_module) from [<c01bd314>]
> >> (load_module+0xe5c/0x1004) [ 10.119049] [<c01bd314>] (load_module) from
> >> [<c01bd68c>] (SyS_finit_module+0x88/0x90) [ 10.119079] [<c01bd68c>]
> >> (SyS_finit_module) from [<c0107040>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c)
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c | 3 +--
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> >> b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c index 5d54e2c..6e2624e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> >> @@ -2114,7 +2114,6 @@ static int isp_of_parse_nodes(struct device *dev,
> >>
> >> isd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*isd), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!isd) {
> >> - of_node_put(node);
> >
> > I don't think this one is correct. Looking at the context
> >
> > while (notifier->num_subdevs < ISP_MAX_SUBDEVS &&
> > (node = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(dev->of_node, node))) {
> > struct isp_async_subdev *isd;
> >
> > isd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*isd), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!isd) {
> > of_node_put(node);
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > }
> >
> > notifier->subdevs[notifier->num_subdevs] = &isd->asd;
> >
> > if (isp_of_parse_node(dev, node, isd)) {
> > of_node_put(node);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > isd->asd.match.of.node =
> > of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(node);
> > of_node_put(node);
> >
> > if (!isd->asd.match.of.node) {
> > dev_warn(dev, "bad remote port parent\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > isd->asd.match_type = V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_OF;
> > notifier->num_subdevs++;
> > }
> >
> > of_graph_get_next_endpoint() increases the reference count of the node it
> > returns, which needs a corresponding of_node_put() in the error paths. It
> > thus look like to me that the function isn't correct in that the
> > devm_kzalloc() and !isd->asd.match.of.node error paths.
>
> Ah ok, the of_node_put() is not always wrong.
>
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -2126,7 +2125,7 @@ static int isp_of_parse_nodes(struct device *dev,
> >> }
> >>
> >> isd->asd.match.of.node =
> >> of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(node);
> >> - of_node_put(node);
> >> +
> >
> > This change is correct not because of_graph_get_next_endpoint() has called
> > of_node_put() but because it *will* call it on the next iteration.
> >
> > How about the following patch instead ?
> >
> > commit 4ed9893bf52c90181c8d5b1ae29a37556b89f1da
> > Author: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu Sep 29 11:41:24 2016 +0300
> >
> > omap3isp: Fix OF node double put when parsing OF graph
> >
> > When parsing the graph the driver loops over all endpoints using
> > of_graph_get_next_endpoint(). The function handles reference counting
> > of the passed and returned nodes, so the returned node's reference
> > count must not be decreased manually in the normal path.
> >
> > Move the offending of_node_put() call to the error path that requires
> > manual reference count handling.
> >
> > Reported-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c index 5e212668f726..f8b437cc8943
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> > @@ -2131,23 +2131,18 @@ static int isp_of_parse_nodes(struct device *dev,
> > struct isp_async_subdev *isd;
> >
> > isd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*isd), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!isd) {
> > - of_node_put(node);
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > - }
> > + if (!isd)
> > + goto error;
> >
> > notifier->subdevs[notifier->num_subdevs] = &isd->asd;
> >
> > - if (isp_of_parse_node(dev, node, isd)) {
> > - of_node_put(node);
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > + if (isp_of_parse_node(dev, node, isd))
> > + goto error;
> >
> > isd->asd.match.of.node =
> > of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(node);
> > - of_node_put(node);
> > if (!isd->asd.match.of.node) {
> > dev_warn(dev, "bad remote port parent\n");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + goto error;
> > }
> >
> > isd->asd.match_type = V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_OF;
> > @@ -2155,6 +2150,10 @@ static int isp_of_parse_nodes(struct device *dev,
> > }
> >
> > return notifier->num_subdevs;
> > +
> > +error:
> > + of_node_put(node);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > static int isp_subdev_notifier_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *async,
>
> Seems to fix the reported warning, but obviously I can't test the error
> paths.

Can I add

Tested-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

to the patch ?

> So let's go this way (until someone shows a bug in the error path).

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart