Re: 0-day bot a bit too verbose (was Re: [linux-review:Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139 1/1] drivers/hid/hid-led.c:60:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'le16')

[Fengguang Wu]

Hi Pavel,

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 01:22:10PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > tree:   https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Pavel-Machek/hid-led-c-remove-unneccessary-underscores/20161003-162139
> > head:   596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de
> > commit: 596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de [1/1] hid-led.c: remove unneccessary underscores
> > config: openrisc-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> > compiler: or32-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.5.1-or32-1.0rc1
> > reproduce:
> >         wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >         git checkout 596471d181ad324301428001db102c810df4a6de
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         make.cross ARCH=openrisc
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> I get it, it does not compile anywhere, because I made a mistake. Ok?
>
> But I know now, and if it does not compile on x86, there's very very
> little chance that it would compile on openrisc.
>
> Can we stop the announcements after first or second failure?

Sorry for the extra noises!

The build bot will stop complaining after 3 reports on the same
commit. Shall I further reduce the threshold to 1 or 2? It'll risk
hiding real different/independent errors though.

Thanks,
Fengguang