Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: fix masking of pinmux functions
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Mon Oct 03 2016 - 16:55:39 EST
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sun 25 Sep 23:36 PDT 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 2:36 AM, John Crispin <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > The following commit introduced a regression by not properly masking the
>>> > calculated value.
>>> > commit 47a01ee9a6c39fe1 ("pinctrl: qcom: Clear all function selection bits")
>> Please use the format: Fixes: %h (\"%s\")
>>> > Signed-off-by: John Crispin <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Now I'm confused how it ever worked.... but agreed, the code looks wrong.
>> I agree, we should have seen some issues based on this, I presume we
>> where "lucky".
>>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> @Linus, the corrected patch appeared in v4.8-rc1, would you mind
>> including this in a pull for v4.8?
> I would have, had I been more attentive. And you even told me in person to
> look at this :/ sorry.
> Now I have the problem that I don't have the original patch in my inbox
> at all: it might have been sent to some qcom-specific mailing list?
It hit my (linaro) spam for some reason. Must be a problem between the
sending side and how google mail classifies spam.