Re: [GIT PULL] ACPI material for v4.9-rc1
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Wed Oct 05 2016 - 15:44:20 EST
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Linus Torvalds
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This goes early as I will be traveling for a good part of the next week.
> So you're presumably traveling, but I thought I'd mention this anyway,
> since it seems to be new (but maybe I just never noticed before)..
> I now get this during early bootup:
> ACPI Error: [\_SB_.PCI0.XHC_.RHUB.HS11] Namespace lookup failure,
> AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/dswload-210)
> ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog
> ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND, (SSDT:xh_rvp08) while loading table
> ACPI Error: 1 table load failures, 8 successful (20160831/tbxfload-246)
> and it has no actual other negative effects except that it makes my
> boot screen flicker (because the boot wants to show me errors in
> between the usual graphical "clean" boot screen).
> Are those failures so bad that they should be marked as errors?
They come from ACPICA that appears to have problems with some AML in
the ACPI tables, but I agree that they should rather be debug
Lv, it looks like these messages could only be useful for debugging,
so any chance to reduce their log level accordingly?