Re: [PATCH v9 17/19] drm/virtio: kconfig: Fix recursive dependency issue.
From: Peter Griffin
Date: Thu Oct 06 2016 - 05:37:34 EST
Sorry for the delay, I've been travelling last week.
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Emil,
> > On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >> On 5 September 2016 at 14:16, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC must select REMOTEPROC, which exposes the following
> >> > recursive dependency.
> >> >
> >> From a humble skim through remoteproc, drm and a few other subsystems
> >> I think the above is wrong. All the drivers (outside of remoteproc),
> >> that I've seen, depend on the core component, they don't select it.
> > I will let Bjorn comment on the remoteproc subsystem Kconfig design, and
> > why it is like it is.
> > For this particular SLIM_RPROC I have added it to Kconfig in keeping with all
> > the other drivers in the remoteproc subsystem which has exposed this recursive
> > dependency issue.
> > For this particular kconfig symbol a quick grep reveals more drivers in
> > the kernel using 'select', than 'depend on'
> > git grep "select VIRTIO" | wc -l
> > 14
> > git grep "depends on VIRTIO" | wc -l
> > 10
> >> Furthermore most places explicitly hide the drivers from the menu if
> >> the core component isn't enabled.
> > Remoteproc subsystem takes a different approach, the core code is only enabled
> > if a driver which relies on it is enabled. This IMHO makes sense, as
> > remoteproc is not widely used (only a few particular ARM SoC's).
> > It is true that for subsystems which rely on the core component being
> > explicitly enabled, they often tend to hide drivers which depend on it
> > from the menu unless it is. This also makes sense.
> >> Is there something that requires such a different/unusual behaviour in
> >> remoteproc ?
> > I'm not sure it is that unusual...looking at config USB, it selects USB_COMMON in
> > mfd subsystem, client drivers select MFD_CORE.
> > I've added Arnd to this thread, as I've seen lots of Kconfig patches from him
> > recently, maybe he has some thoughts on whether this is the correct fix or not?
> select should be used with care. select will force
> a symbol to a value without visiting the dependencies.
> By abusing select you are able to select a symbol FOO even
> if FOO depends on BAR that is not set.
> In general use select only for non-visible symbols
> (no prompts anywhere) and for symbols with no dependencies.
> That will limit the usefulness but on the other hand avoid
> the illegal configurations all over.
Thanks for the documentation link. I believe this proves this patch is an
appropriate fix as VIRTIO is a non-visible symbol, and has no dependencies.
In fact the help text for VIRTIO even states this option should be selected
by any driver which implements virtio.
> People tend to abuse select because it's "convenient". If you depend,
> but some of your dependencies aren't met, you're in for some digging
> through Kconfig to find the missing deps. Just to make the option you
> want visible in menuconfig. If you instead select something with
> dependencies, it'll be right most of the time, and it's "convenient",
> until it breaks. (And hey, it usually breaks for someone else with some
> other config, so it's still convenient for you.)
I'm sure they do but in this case it is actually the use of 'depends on'
which has caused the breakage and inconvenience for somebody else and sadly this
inconvienice is still on-going due to this patch not being applied or getting an
acked-by from the appropriate maintainers.
> Perhaps kconfig should complain about selecting visible symbols and
> symbols with dependencies.
That sounds like it would be a useful addition.
Is it possible to get this patch applied or an acked-by to avoid further delay
to the fdma series?