[tip:x86/asm] x86/unwind: Ensure stack grows down

From: tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
Date: Fri Oct 28 2016 - 02:50:55 EST


Commit-ID: 24d86f59093b0bcb3756cdf47f2db10ff4e90dbb
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/24d86f59093b0bcb3756cdf47f2db10ff4e90dbb
Author: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:10:58 -0500
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:16:45 +0200

x86/unwind: Ensure stack grows down

Add a sanity check to ensure the stack only grows down, and print a
warning if the check fails.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: 20161027131058.tpdffwlqipv7pcd6@treble">http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161027131058.tpdffwlqipv7pcd6@treble
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
index 5639db6..ea7b7f9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
@@ -32,6 +32,15 @@ unsigned long unwind_get_return_address(struct unwind_state *state)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unwind_get_return_address);

+static size_t regs_size(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ /* x86_32 regs from kernel mode are two words shorter: */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32) && !user_mode(regs))
+ return sizeof(*regs) - 2*sizeof(long);
+
+ return sizeof(*regs);
+}
+
static bool is_last_task_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
{
unsigned long bp = (unsigned long)state->bp;
@@ -79,6 +88,7 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
struct pt_regs *regs;
unsigned long *next_bp, *next_frame;
size_t next_len;
+ enum stack_type prev_type = state->stack_info.type;

if (unwind_done(state))
return false;
@@ -142,6 +152,15 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
goto bad_address;
}

+ /* Make sure it only unwinds up and doesn't overlap the last frame: */
+ if (state->stack_info.type == prev_type) {
+ if (state->regs && (void *)next_frame < (void *)state->regs + regs_size(state->regs))
+ goto bad_address;
+
+ if (state->bp && (void *)next_frame < (void *)state->bp + FRAME_HEADER_SIZE)
+ goto bad_address;
+ }
+
/* move to the next frame */
if (regs) {
state->regs = regs;
@@ -154,10 +173,17 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
return true;

bad_address:
- printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING
- "WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at %p in %s:%d has bad value %p\n",
- state->bp, state->task->comm,
- state->task->pid, next_bp);
+ if (state->regs) {
+ printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING
+ "WARNING: kernel stack regs at %p in %s:%d has bad 'bp' value %p\n",
+ state->regs, state->task->comm,
+ state->task->pid, next_frame);
+ } else {
+ printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING
+ "WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at %p in %s:%d has bad value %p\n",
+ state->bp, state->task->comm,
+ state->task->pid, next_frame);
+ }
the_end:
state->stack_info.type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
return false;