Re: [GIT PULL] Re: [PATCH 08/15] perf tools: Introduce timestamp_in_usec()

[Ingo Molnar]

* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Em Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:30:41AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:53:38AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 04:14:55PM -0700, Joonwoo Park escreveu:
> > > > Hmm.. I didn't ACK this patch because of bug I commented at
> > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg1256724.html
> 
> > > > s/work_list->max_lat/work_list->max_lat_at/
> 
> > > Sorry about that, I took the "thanks for taking care of this" as an ack,
> > > now that I re-read that message I saw your points later on in that
> > > e-mail.
> 
> > > Since Ingo hasn't pulled this, I'll try fixing it, will check that other
> > > naming issue,
> 
> > So, here is how it ended up, it fixes the problem you pointed out and
> > renames the function to follow the scnprintf() convention, as used
> > elsewhere in tools/perf (tools/perf/util/annotate.h has several
> > examples).
> 
> Ingo, I've just signed a perf-core-for-mingo-20161028 with the only
> change being the patch below, re-run my tests, I think this doesn't
> introduce any bugs and addresses Joonwoo's concerns, please consider
> pulling.

Pulled, thanks a lot Arnaldo!

	Ingo