Re: [PATCH] driver core: Make Kconfig text for DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE stronger

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Mon Oct 31 2016 - 08:29:43 EST


Hi Greg,

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:12:45AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > The current state of driver removal is not great.
>> > CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE finds lots of errors. The help text
>> > currently undersells exactly how many errors this option will find. Add
>> > a bit more description to indicate this option shouldn't be turned on
>> > unless you actually want to debug driver removal. The text can be
>> > changed later when more drivers are fixed up.
>>
>> Indeed, this is failing miserably for e.g. SoC clock drivers using
>> platform_driver_probe(), which are never retried, rendering the complete
>> system useless.
>
> Why are they never retried?

Because platform_driver_probe() is meant for non-hotpluggable devices,
and unregisters the platform driver immediately if probe fails.
See also the comments for __platform_driver_probe():

* Note that this is incompatible with deferred probing.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds