Re: [PATCH 3/4] loop: Add 'lo_logical_blocksize'
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Tue Nov 01 2016 - 10:01:34 EST
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:37:18PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Add a new field 'lo_logical_blocksize' to hold the logical
> blocksize of the loop device.
Why do we use the same flag for both block sizes? If there is a good
reason for that it should be documented and both should be in the same
patch.