Re: [RFC 0/6] vfs: Add timestamp range check support

From: Deepa Dinamani
Date: Sun Nov 06 2016 - 12:44:57 EST

Next message: Noam Camus: "[PATCH v4 3/3] clocksource: Add clockevent support to NPS400 driver"
Previous message: Oleg Drokin: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: obdclass: Add handling of error returned by lustre_cfg_new"
In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [RFC 0/6] vfs: Add timestamp range check support"
Next in thread: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [RFC 0/6] vfs: Add timestamp range check support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I will post xfs tests that validate mount and range checking.
I will keep the policy same as what the RFC suggests for now.

Clamping can be verified once vfs is transitioned to using time64_t.

Thanks,
Deepa

Next message: Noam Camus: "[PATCH v4 3/3] clocksource: Add clockevent support to NPS400 driver"
Previous message: Oleg Drokin: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: obdclass: Add handling of error returned by lustre_cfg_new"
In reply to: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [RFC 0/6] vfs: Add timestamp range check support"
Next in thread: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [RFC 0/6] vfs: Add timestamp range check support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]