Re: perf: fuzzer KASAN slab-out-of-bounds in snb_uncore_imc_event_del

From: Vince Weaver
Date: Tue Nov 15 2016 - 00:57:52 EST


On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Vince Weaver wrote:

> Anyway as per the suggestion at Linux Plumbers I enabled KASAN and on my
> haswell machine it falls over in a few minutes of running the perf_fuzzer.
>
> [ 205.740194] ==================================================================
> [ 205.748005] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in snb_uncore_imc_event_del+0x6c/0xa0 at addr ffff8800caa43768
> [ 205.758324] Read of size 8 by task perf_fuzzer/6618
> [ 205.763589] CPU: 0 PID: 6618 Comm: perf_fuzzer Not tainted 4.9.0-rc5 #4
> [ 205.770721] Hardware name: LENOVO 10AM000AUS/SHARKBAY, BIOS FBKT72AUS 01/26/2014
> [ 205.778689] ffff8800c3c479b8 ffffffff816bb796 ffff88011ec00600 ffff8800caa43580
> [ 205.786759] ffff8800c3c479e0 ffffffff812fb961 ffff8800c3c47a78 ffff8800caa43580
> [ 205.794850] ffff8800caa43580 ffff8800c3c47a68 ffffffff812fbbd8 ffff8800c3c47a28
> [ 205.802911] Call Trace:
> [ 205.805559] [<ffffffff816bb796>] dump_stack+0x63/0x8d
> [ 205.811135] [<ffffffff812fb961>] kasan_object_err+0x21/0x70
> [ 205.817267] [<ffffffff812fbbd8>] kasan_report_error+0x1d8/0x4c0
> [ 205.823752] [<ffffffff81133275>] ? __lock_is_held+0x75/0xc0
> [ 205.829868] [<ffffffff81025b12>] ? snb_uncore_imc_read_counter+0x42/0x50
> [ 205.837198] [<ffffffff810222e2>] ? uncore_perf_event_update+0xe2/0x160
> [ 205.844337] [<ffffffff812fc319>] kasan_report+0x39/0x40
> [ 205.850085] [<ffffffff81025e3c>] ? snb_uncore_imc_event_del+0x6c/0xa0

The best I can tell this maps to:

static void snb_uncore_imc_event_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
struct intel_uncore_box *box = uncore_event_to_box(event);
int i;

snb_uncore_imc_event_stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE);

for (i = 0; i < box->n_events; i++) {
>>> if (event == box->event_list[i]) {
--box->n_events;
break;
}
}
}

Can this code be right? Does it actually remove the event?
The similar code in

static void uncore_pmu_event_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)

....

for (i = 0; i < box->n_events; i++) {
if (event == box->event_list[i]) {
uncore_put_event_constraint(box, event);

for (++i; i < box->n_events; i++)
box->event_list[i - 1] = box->event_list[i];

--box->n_events;
break;
}
}


seems like it is more likely to be correct.

Vince