Re: [PATCH] rcu: Avoid unnecessary contention of rcu node lock

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed Nov 16 2016 - 08:59:41 EST


On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:49:31 +0900
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 05:57:13PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > It's unnecessary to try to print stacks of blocked tasks in the case
> > that ndetected == 0. Furthermore, calling rcu_print_detail_task_stall()
> > causes to acquire rnp locks as many times as the number of leaf nodes
> > plus one for root node. It's unnecessary at all in the case.
>
> Hello,
>
> I have two questions. Could you answer them?
>
> 1. What do you think about this patch?
> 2. Is there a tree where patches about rcu are pulled into, before
> being pulled into mainline tree?
> For example, tip tree in case of scheduler patches.

I believe Paul sends to the tip tree too.

>
> It would be appriciated if you answer them.
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Byungchul
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 287f468..ab2f743 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -1374,6 +1374,9 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long gpnum)
> > (long)rsp->gpnum, (long)rsp->completed, totqlen);
> > if (ndetected) {
> > rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(rsp);
> > +
> > + /* Complain about tasks blocking the grace period. */
> > + rcu_print_detail_task_stall(rsp);
> > } else {
> > if (READ_ONCE(rsp->gpnum) != gpnum ||
> > READ_ONCE(rsp->completed) == gpnum) {
> > @@ -1390,9 +1393,6 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long gpnum)
> > }

What about showing it in else statement of the above if as well?

sched_show_task(current);
rcu_print_detail_task_stall(rsp);

-- Steve

> > }
> >
> > - /* Complain about tasks blocking the grace period. */
> > - rcu_print_detail_task_stall(rsp);
> > -
> > rcu_check_gp_kthread_starvation(rsp);
> >
> > panic_on_rcu_stall();
> > --
> > 1.9.1