[PATCH] cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates

From: Stratos Karafotis
Date: Wed Nov 16 2016 - 14:14:00 EST


The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.

Both increase and decrease happen at steps.

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index a48b724..7522ec6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
* sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
* (default), then we try to decrease frequency
*
- * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
- * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
+ * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
+ * frequency
*/
static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
--
2.7.4