Re: Formal description of system call interface
From: Cyril Hrubis
Date: Mon Nov 21 2016 - 11:10:59 EST
> Description of "returns fd or this set of errors" looks simple and useful.
> Any test system or fuzzer will be able to verify that kernel actually returns
> claimed return values. Also Carlos expressed interested in errno values
> in the context of glibc.
> I would do it from day one.
> Re more complex side effects. I always feared that a description suitable
> for automatic verification (i.e. zero false positives, otherwise it is useless)
> may be too difficult to achieve.
I'm afraid it may be as well. I would expect that we will end up with
something quite complex with a large set of exceptions from the rules.
> Cyril, Tavis, can you come up with some set of predicates that can be
> checked automatically yet still useful?
> We can start small, e.g. "must not alter virtual address space".
I will try to thing about this a bit.