Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary runtime services
From: Joe Perches
Date: Tue Nov 22 2016 - 09:58:19 EST
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 14:17 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Small nit, checkpatch usually complains that this should be written as
> > 12-character SHA-1 followed by the commit subject, i.e.
> >
> > 0a637ee61247 ("x86/efi: Allow invocation of arbitrary boot services")
>
> In this case, checkpatch is wrong.
Why do you think so?