Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/67] 4.8.11-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:20:40PM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc boot: 207 boots: 8 failed, 196 passed with 3 offline (v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7)
> 
> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7/
> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7/
> 
> Tree: stable-rc
> Branch: local/linux-4.8.y
> Git Describe: v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7
> Git Commit: 5b1cb43a9ac7f608fdfc590c139aa66ead8d19ed
> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Tested: 57 unique boards, 18 SoC families, 30 builds out of 207
> 
> Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8.10-68-g5b1cb43a9ac7&fail
> 
> arm:
> 
>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
>         exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab
> 
>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
>         at91-sama5d4_xplained: 1 failed lab
> 
>     exynos_defconfig:
>         exynos5250-arndale: 1 failed lab
> 
> x86:
> 
>     defconfig+CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST=y:
>         x86-kvm: 1 failed lab
> 
>     defconfig+CONFIG_KASAN=y:
>         x86-kvm: 1 failed lab
> 
>     defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y:
>         x86-kvm: 1 failed lab
> 
>     defconfig+kvm_guest:
>         x86-kvm: 1 failed lab
> 
>     x86_64_defconfig:
>         x86-kvm: 1 failed lab

That's not good, is this a code problem, or a "lab" problem?

The logs look like nothing is working for these, so is this a -rc
problem?

thanks,

greg k-h