[PATCH v2 1/2] vfio iommu type1: Fix size argument to vfio_find_dma() during DMA UNMAP.

[Kirti Wankhede]

vfio_dma keeps track of address range from (dma->iova + 0) to
(dma->iova + dma->size - 1), while vfio_find_dma() search logic looks for
range from (dma->iova + 1) to (dma->iova + dma->size).
In vfio_find_dma(), when the start address is equal to dma->iova and size
is 0, check for the end of search range makes it to take wrong side of
RB-tree. That fails the search even though the address is present in
mapped dma ranges. Due to this, in vfio_dma_do_unmap(), while checking
boundary conditions, size should be set to 1 for verifying start address
of unmap range.
vfio_find_dma() is also used to verify last address in unmap range with
size = 0, but in that case address to be searched is calculated with
size - 1 and so it works correctly.

Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Neo Jia <cjia@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index a28fbddb505c..8e9e94ccb2ff 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ again:
 	 * mappings within the range.
 	 */
 	if (iommu->v2) {
-		dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova, 0);
+		dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova, 1);
 		if (dma && dma->iova != unmap->iova) {
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto unlock;
-- 
2.7.0