Re: [PATCH] doc: Explain light-handed markup preference a bit better

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 05:08:30PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Sorry, but I agree with Daniel here: we should provide a guide
> > for those people that will be helping with the document conversion.
> 
> That goal is not mutually exclusive with keeping this document concise.
> 
> That is all.

Opted for some comprimise-y thing, going with Jani's proposal for the
fixed-width quoting (since mine was definitely too wordy), but opted to
keep the others unchanged. Still feels like overall a concise and balanced
expose, but happy to change if folks object.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch