Re: [RESEND][PATCH v4] cgroup: Use CAP_SYS_RESOURCE to allow a process to migrate other tasks between cgroups
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Fri Dec 09 2016 - 08:27:35 EST
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:39:38PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> So just to clarify the discussion for my purposes and make sure I
> understood, per-cgroup CAP rules was not desired, and instead we
> should either utilize an existing cap (are there still objections to
> CAP_SYS_RESOURCE? - this isn't clear to me) or create a new one (ie,
> bring back the older CAP_CGROUP_MIGRATE patch).
Let's create a new one. It looks to be a bit too different to share
with an existing one.
> Tejun: Do you have a more finished version of your patch that I should
> add my changes on top of?
Oh, just submit the patch on top of the current for-next. I can queue
mine on top of yours. They are mostly orthogonal.