Re: [GIT PULL] readlink cleanup

From: Al Viro
Date: Sat Dec 10 2016 - 21:39:32 EST

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 02:36:20AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:

> I'm still not sure what does "vfs: convert ->readlink to same signature as
> ->get_link" buy us. If anything, the result appears to be more complex -
> you make freeing that buffer delayed (and introduce a dynamically allocated
> buffer in one case that didn't use it)...

PS: everything prior to that point looks fine.