Re: [PATCH] doc: Explain light-handed markup preference a bit better
From: Jonathan Corbet
Date: Mon Dec 12 2016 - 12:54:54 EST
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 23:06:57 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hm yeah, separate conversion section makes sense. In that case I'll
> adopt Jani's suggestion for more terseness in overview document, and
> we can merge Mauro's proposal (or something like it) on top. And I'll
> try to rebase onto latest doc-next too ;-)
> Does that sound like a plan, before I head of and respin v4?
It sounds like a good plan to me.