[PATCH RFC] [media] s5k6aa: set usleep_range greater 0

From: Nicholas Mc Guire
Date: Mon Dec 12 2016 - 20:57:37 EST

As this is not in atomic context and it does not seem like a critical
timing setting a range of 1ms allows the timer subsystem to optimize
the hrtimer here.

Fixes: commit bfa8dd3a0524 ("[media] v4l: Add v4l2 subdev driver for S5K6AAFX sensor")
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@xxxxxxxxx>

problem was located by coccinelle spatch

The problem is that usleep_range is calculating the delay by
exp = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), min)
delta = (u64)(max - min) * NSEC_PER_USEC
so delta is set to 0
and then calls
schedule_hrtimeout_range(exp, 0,...)
effectively this means that the clock subsystem has no room to
optimize which makes little sense as this is not atomic context
anyway so there is not guaratee of precision here.

As this is not a critical delay it is set to a range of 4 to 5
milliseconds - this change needs a review by someone that knows
the details of the device though and preferably would increase
that range.

Patch was only compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig + MEDIA_SUPPORT=m

Patch is against 4.9.0 (localversion-next is next-20161212)

drivers/media/i2c/s5k6aa.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/s5k6aa.c b/drivers/media/i2c/s5k6aa.c
index faee113..9fd254a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/s5k6aa.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/s5k6aa.c
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static int __s5k6aa_power_on(struct s5k6aa *s5k6aa)

if (s5k6aa->s_power)
ret = s5k6aa->s_power(1);
- usleep_range(4000, 4000);
+ usleep_range(4000, 5000);

if (s5k6aa_gpio_deassert(s5k6aa, RST))