Re: [PATCH v5] cgroup: Add new capability to allow a process to migrate other tasks between cgroups

[Tejun Heo]

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:47:19AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> > Control group control?  The word control has a specific meaning for
> > cgroups and that second control doesn't make much sense to me.
> 
> But this would go against the long tradition of RAS syndrome and
> things like "struct task_struct".  :)

Well, now that you put it that way, it's starting to look good. :)
But, let's just go for CAP_CGROUP if everyone is okay with it.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun