Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Wed Dec 14 2016 - 09:26:12 EST

Next message: Mathias Nyman: "Re: xhci_reset_endpoint() doesn't reset endpoint"
Previous message: gabriel.fernandez: "[PATCH] pinctrl: stm32: activate strict mux mode"
In reply to: Javier Martinez Canillas: "Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800"
Next in thread: Javier Martinez Canillas: "Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 11:06:45 AM Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
> Hello Bartlomiej,
>
> On 12/14/2016 10:28 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 04:18:05 PM Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> Hello Bartlomiej,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> On 12/13/2016 01:52 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >>> Add missing 2000MHz & 1900MHz OPPs (for A15 cores) and 1400MHz OPP
> >>> (for A7 cores). Also update common Odroid-XU3 Lite/XU3/XU4 thermal
> >>> cooling maps to account for new OPPs.
> >>>
> >>> Since new OPPs are not available on all Exynos5422/5800 boards modify
> >>> dts files for Odroid-XU3 Lite (limited to 1.8 GHz / 1.3 GHz) & Peach
> >>> Pi (limited to 2.0 GHz / 1.3 GHz) accordingly.
> >>>
> >>> Tested on Odroid-XU3 and XU3 Lite.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Andreas Faerber <afaerber@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Ben Gamari <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi | 14 +++++++-------
> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts | 4 ++++
> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >>> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi 2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi 2016-12-13 15:59:33.775763261 +0100
> >>> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
> >>> /*
> >>> * When reaching cpu_alert3, reduce CPU
> >>> * by 2 steps. On Exynos5422/5800 that would
> >>> - * be: 1600 MHz and 1100 MHz.
> >>> + * (usually) be: 1800 MHz and 1200 MHz.
> >>> */
> >>> map3 {
> >>> trip = <&cpu_alert3>;
> >>> @@ -131,16 +131,16 @@
> >>>
> >>> /*
> >>> * When reaching cpu_alert4, reduce CPU
> >>> - * further, down to 600 MHz (11 steps for big,
> >>> - * 7 steps for LITTLE).
> >>> + * further, down to 600 MHz (13 steps for big,
> >>> + * 8 steps for LITTLE).
> >>> */
> >>> - map5 {
> >>> + cooling_map5: map5 {
> >>> trip = <&cpu_alert4>;
> >>> - cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 7>;
> >>> + cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 8>;
> >>> };
> >>> - map6 {
> >>> + cooling_map6: map6 {
> >>> trip = <&cpu_alert4>;
> >>> - cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 11>;
> >>> + cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 13>;
> >>> };
> >>> };
> >>> };
> >>> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts 2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-lite.dts 2016-12-13 15:59:33.775763261 +0100
> >>> @@ -21,6 +21,23 @@
> >>> compatible = "hardkernel,odroid-xu3-lite", "samsung,exynos5800", "samsung,exynos5";
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +&cluster_a15_opp_table {
> >>> + /delete-node/opp@2000000000;
> >>> + /delete-node/opp@1900000000;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +&cluster_a7_opp_table {
> >>> + /delete-node/opp@1400000000;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>
> >> I think that a comment in the DTS why these operating points aren't available
> >> in this board will make more clear why the nodes are being deleted.
> >
> > Ok, I will add these comments in the next patch revision.
> >
> >>> +&cooling_map5 {
> >>> + cooling-device = <&cpu0 3 7>;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +&cooling_map6 {
> >>> + cooling-device = <&cpu4 3 11>;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> &pwm {
> >>> /*
> >>> * PWM 0 -- fan
> >>> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts 2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts 2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> >>> @@ -146,6 +146,10 @@
> >>> vdd-supply = <&ldo9_reg>;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +&cluster_a7_opp_table {
> >>> + /delete-property/opp@1400000000;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> &cpu0 {
> >>> cpu-supply = <&buck2_reg>;
> >>> };
> >>> Index: b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi 2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800.dtsi 2016-12-13 15:59:33.779763261 +0100
> >>> @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> &cluster_a15_opp_table {
> >>> + opp@2000000000 {
> >>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2000000000>;
> >>> + opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
> >>> + clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
> >>> + };
> >>> + opp@1900000000 {
> >>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1900000000>;
> >>> + opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
> >>> + clock-latency-ns = <140000>;
> >>> + };
> >>> opp@1700000000 {
> >>> opp-microvolt = <1250000>;
> >>> };
> >>> @@ -85,6 +95,11 @@
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>
> >> AFAIK Thomas restricted the maximum OPP, because for A15 freqs > 1.8GHz the
> >> INT rail would need to be scaled up as well since there's a maximum voltage
> >> difference between the ARM and INT rails before the system becomes unstable:
> >>
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/276766.html
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/2/419
> >>
> >> The ChromiumOS vendor tree uses a virtual regulator driver that makes sure
> >> the maximum voltage skew is between a limit. But that never made to mainline:
> >>
> >> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dtsi#90
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/28
> >>
> >> Did that change and there's infrastructure in mainline now to cope with that?
> >> If that's the case, I think it would be good to mention in the commit message.
> >
> > I was not aware of this limitation and AFAIK mainline has currently
> > no code to handle it. I also cannot find any code to handle this in
>
> Yes, that's what I thought as well but maybe I was missing something.
>
> > Hardkernel's vendor kernel for Odroid-XU3 board.
> >
> > Do you know whether this problem exists also on Exynos5422/5800
> > SoCs or only on Exynos5420 one? I see that ChromiumOS uses virtual
> > regulator code also on Exynos5800 SoC based Peach Pi board but was
> > the problem actually present on this board?
> >
>
> My understanding is that this problem is present in 5420/5422/5800
> but I have no way to confirm this. I'm just guessing from the info
> in the ChromiumOS vendor tree.
>
> If you look at the commit that added the regulator-locker driver,
> the test says to be done in a Peach Pi so it seems the problem is
> not restricted to only Exynos5420:
>
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/ba63620feace4eaed5572ac2e77d8d61754af704
>
> > [ I added Arjun to Cc:, maybe he can help in explaining this issue
> > (unfortunately Inderpal's email is no longer working). ]
> >
>
> Added Abhilash to cc list as well since he was involved in the Exynos ChromeOS tree.

Abhilash's email is also no longer valid.. :(

> > Please also note that on Exynos5422/5800 SoCs the same ARM rail
> > voltage is used for 1.9 GHz & 2.0 GHz OPPs as for the 1.8 GHz one.
> > IOW if the problem exists it is already present in the mainline
> > kernel.
> >
>
> Ah, I only looked at your patch and I didn't compare the voltage levels
> in your 1.9 GHz and 2.0 GHz OPPs with the current 1.8 GHz in mainline.
>
> I wonder if the voltage levels in your patch are correct then, since the
> ChromiumOS tree uses a higher voltages for the 1.9 GHz and 2.0 GHz OPPs:
>
> /*
> * Default ASV table
> */
> static const unsigned int asv_voltage_5420[CPUFREQ_NUM_LEVELS] = {
> 1362500, /* L0 2100 */
> 1312500, /* L1 2000 */
> 1275000, /* L2 1900 */
> 1225000, /* L3 1800 */
> 1200000, /* L4 1700 */
>
> This is from https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5420-cpufreq.c#175

I think that the above voltages are original ones for Exynos5420
(not for Exynos5422/5800).

The voltages in my patch were taken from Hardkernel's kernel for
Odroid-XU3:

/*
* ASV group voltage table
*/
static const unsigned int asv_voltage_5422_CA15[CPUFREQ_LEVEL_END_CA15] = {
...
1250000, /* L4 2000 */
1250000, /* L5 1900 */
1250000, /* L6 1800 */
...

https://github.com/hardkernel/linux/blob/odroidxu3-3.10.y-android/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5422-eagle-cpufreq.c#L314

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

Next message: Mathias Nyman: "Re: xhci_reset_endpoint() doesn't reset endpoint"
Previous message: gabriel.fernandez: "[PATCH] pinctrl: stm32: activate strict mux mode"
In reply to: Javier Martinez Canillas: "Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800"
Next in thread: Javier Martinez Canillas: "Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]