Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] siphash: add cryptographically secure hashtable function

From: Jason A. Donenfeld
Date: Thu Dec 15 2016 - 18:48:04 EST

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> By the way, if you target net-next, it is currently closed. So no need
> to hurry.

Honestly I have no idea what I'm targeting. The hash function touches
lib/. The secure_seq stuff touches net/. The rng stuff touches
random.c. Shall this be for net-next? For lib-next (doesn't exist)?
For tytso-next? Since a lot of feedback has come from netdev people, I
suspect net-next is the correct answer. In that case, I'll ask Ted for
his sign-off to touch random.c, and then we'll get this queued up in
net-next. Please correct me if this doesn't actually resemble how
things work around here...