Re: [PATCH 1/8] extcon: axp288: Remove dependency on non-existing platform_data

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Hans,

On 2016ë 12ì 19ì 17:18, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 19-12-16 07:58, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> This series look good to me. I added the comment
>> for patch4/5. If you agree following two comment, I'll merge these series for 4.11.
>>
>> - patch4 uses the EXTCON_NONE when setting the previous_cable in probe()
>> - patch5, I don't want to use the dev_info on the fly. So, I want to drop the patch5.
> 
> Sounds good to me, thank you for reviewing these patches so quickly.

Applied these series except for patch5 for 4.11.

Regards,
Chanwoo Choi

> 
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chanwoo Choi
>>
>> On 2016ë 12ì 19ì 15:10, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> On 2016ë 12ì 19ì 09:13, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> When the extcon_axp288 driver was originally merged, it was merged with
>>>> a dependency on some other driver providing platform data for it.
>>>>
>>>> However such another driver was never merged, so the extcon_axp288 as
>>>> merged upstream has never worked, its probe method simply always returns
>>>> -ENODEV.
>>>>
>>>> This commit drops the dependency on the pdata always being there, instead
>>>> it treats not having pdata as the pdata having a NULL gpio_mux_control,
>>>> something which the code was already prepared to handle.
>>>>
>>>> Note that the code for controlling the mux_control gpio is left in place,
>>>> as this may be necessary to allow the axp288 pmic to properly detect the
>>>> charger type (instead of assuming 500mA max charge current) on some
>>>> tablets. This will make it easier for future patches to add support for
>>>> this gpio by getting the gpio info from somewhere.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
>>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Looks good to me.
>>> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
>