Re: [PATCH 1/3] linux/const.h: move UL() macro to include/linux/const.h

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Wed Jan 04 2017 - 04:27:41 EST


Hi Yamada-san,

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Some architectures are duplicating the definition of UL():
>
> #define UL(x) _AC(x, UL)
>
> This is not actually arch-specific, so it will be useful to move it
> to a common header. Currently, we only have the uapi variant for
> linux/const.h, so I am creating include/linux/const.h.
>
> I am also adding _UL(x), _ULL(x), ULL(x) because _AC() is used for
> UL in most places (and ULL in some places). I expect _AC(..., UL)
> will be replaced with _UL(...) or UL(...). The underscore-prefixed
> one should be used for exported headers.
>
> Note:
> I renamed UL(x) in arch/m68k/mm/init.c, where it is used for a
> different meaning.

Shouldn't that be a separate (prerequisite) patch?

> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h | 6 ------
> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 6 ------
> arch/m68k/mm/init.c | 6 +++---
> arch/unicore32/include/asm/memory.h | 6 ------
> include/linux/const.h | 9 +++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/const.h | 9 ++++++---
> 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/const.h

For the m68k change:

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds