Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: Find desired extent in ext4_ext_shift_extents() using binsearch

[Roman Penyaev]

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:44:15PM +0100, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>>
>> (I had to say that right now I am testing on 4.4.28 kernel and testing
>>  on latest sources taken from linux-next will require some time, but of
>>  course I will retest and send up-to-date results)
>>
>> ---
>> Failures: ext4/302 ext4/303 ext4/304 generic/061 generic/063
>> generic/075 generic/079 generic/091 generic/112 generic/127
>> generic/252 generic/263
>> Failed 12 of 200 tests
>
> You didn't say what file system configuration you're using, but I'm
> assuming it's a default ext4 4k configuration?

Yep, that was the default run, 4K block.

> One of the things
> about my kvm-xfstests and gce-xfstests setup is that I test a range of
> file system configurations, and there are specific exclude files to
> skip certain known failures.  Currently we are skipping the following
> tests globally (from kvm-xfstests/test-appliances/files/root/fs/ext4/exclude):

[ cut ]

> You'll see that modulo the encryption failures and some failures on
> the 1k config case which I need to track down and iron out, we're in
> pretty good shape.  Below please find the summary; attached please
> find the full log file.

Thanks a lot.  Perfect reference. That is quite enough for a good start.

This kvm-xfstests is a nice thingy.  That was pretty annoying to rebuild
xfsprogs on a debian jessie, which does not have 'xfs_io -c finsert' by
default.

Theodore, recently I sent an ext4/023 xfstest test.  New test reproduces
the problem with a wrong right shift.  I tried to make the test explicit,
but not sure succeeded or not.  Probably, md5sum is not a good choice to
make things clear, but hexdump of 1000 blocks is quite large (~80K).
Could you please take a look?

Now I am running kvm-xfstests, will figure out what I've done wrong with
recent ext4 patches.

--
Roman