Re: [v2 2/3] ARM: dts: STM32 Add USB FS host mode support

From: Alexandre Torgue
Date: Mon Jan 16 2017 - 06:48:24 EST




On 01/16/2017 11:26 AM, Bruno Herrera wrote:
Hi Alex,

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Bruno,

On 01/16/2017 03:09 AM, Bruno Herrera wrote:

This patch adds the USB pins and nodes for USB HS/FS cores working at FS
speed,
using embedded PHY.

Signed-off-by: Bruno Herrera <bruherrera@xxxxxxxxx>


Sorry, but what is patch 1 & pacth 3 status ?

My bad, I'll add the status of the patch series version 3.

For this one, can split it in 3 patches (one patch for SOC and one for each
board) please.


No problem.


---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429-disco.dts | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi | 35
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429-disco.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429-disco.dts
index 7d0415e..374c5ed 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429-disco.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429-disco.dts
@@ -88,6 +88,16 @@
gpios = <&gpioa 0 0>;
};
};
+
+ /* This turns on vbus for otg for host mode (dwc2) */
+ vcc5v_otg: vcc5v-otg-regulator {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ gpio = <&gpioc 4 0>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&usbotg_pwren_h>;
+ regulator-name = "vcc5_host1";
+ regulator-always-on;
+ };
};

&clk_hse {
@@ -99,3 +109,23 @@
pinctrl-names = "default";
status = "okay";
};
+
+&usbotg_hs {
+ compatible = "st,stm32-fsotg", "snps,dwc2";
+ dr_mode = "host";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&usbotg_fs_pins_b>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
+&pinctrl {
+ usb-host {
+ usbotg_pwren_h: usbotg-pwren-h {
+ pins {
+ pinmux = <STM32F429_PC4_FUNC_GPIO>;
+ bias-disable;
+ drive-push-pull;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+};


Pinctrl muxing has to be defined/declared in stm32f429.dtsi

This is board specific logic and it vary from board to board, should
it be defined here?

Pinmuxing definition is a SOC part (as it is a possibility offered by SOC). Pinmuxing choice is board specific.

Regarding your code, it should not boot. Ex for disco:

+ gpio = <&gpiob 2 0>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&usbotg_pwren_h>;

+

usb-host {
>>> + usbotg_pwren_h: usbotg-pwren-h {
>>> + pins {
>>> + pinmux = <STM32F429_PB2_FUNC_GPIO>;

Indeed, you are declaring two time the pin PB2 (one time through pinctrl and one other time through gpiolib). in strict mode you can't request 2 times the same Pin.
I assume that your driver want controls this GPIO (request/set direction / set, get value ...). in this case you only need to declare this part:

gpio = <&gpiob 2 0>;

The GPIO lib will deal with pinctrl framework for you.
And in this case, yes gpio declaration is board specific so this part will be in board file.

Let me know, if I'm not enough clear.

Regards
Alex






diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
index e4dae0e..bc07aa8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@
reg = <0x40007000 0x400>;
};

- pin-controller {
+ pinctrl: pin-controller {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "st,stm32f429-pinctrl";
@@ -316,6 +316,30 @@
};
};

+ usbotg_fs_pins_a: usbotg_fs@0 {
+ pins {
+ pinmux =
<STM32F429_PA10_FUNC_OTG_FS_ID>,
+
<STM32F429_PA11_FUNC_OTG_FS_DM>,
+
<STM32F429_PA12_FUNC_OTG_FS_DP>;
+ bias-disable;
+ drive-push-pull;
+ slew-rate = <2>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ usbotg_fs_pins_b: usbotg_fs@1 {
+ pins {
+ pinmux =
<STM32F429_PB12_FUNC_OTG_HS_ID>,
+
<STM32F429_PB14_FUNC_OTG_HS_DM>,
+
<STM32F429_PB15_FUNC_OTG_HS_DP>;
+ bias-disable;
+ drive-push-pull;
+ slew-rate = <2>;
+ };
+ };
+
+
+
usbotg_hs_pins_a: usbotg_hs@0 {
pins {
pinmux =
<STM32F429_PH4_FUNC_OTG_HS_ULPI_NXT>,
@@ -420,6 +444,15 @@
status = "disabled";
};

+ usbotg_fs: usb@50000000 {
+ compatible = "st,stm32f4xx-fsotg", "snps,dwc2";
+ reg = <0x50000000 0x40000>;
+ interrupts = <67>;
+ clocks = <&rcc 0 39>;
+ clock-names = "otg";
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
+
rng: rng@50060800 {
compatible = "st,stm32-rng";
reg = <0x50060800 0x400>;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
index 8877c00..8ae6763 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts
@@ -68,6 +68,17 @@
soc {
dma-ranges = <0xc0000000 0x0 0x10000000>;
};
+
+ /* This turns on vbus for otg for host mode (dwc2) */
+ vcc5v_otg: vcc5v-otg-regulator {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ enable-active-high;
+ gpio = <&gpiob 2 0>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&usbotg_pwren_h>;
+ regulator-name = "vcc5_host1";
+ regulator-always-on;
+ };
};

&rcc {
@@ -81,3 +92,22 @@
&usart3 {
status = "okay";
};
+
+&usbotg_fs {
+ dr_mode = "host";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&usbotg_fs_pins_a>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
+&pinctrl {
+ usb-host {
+ usbotg_pwren_h: usbotg-pwren-h {
+ pins {
+ pinmux = <STM32F429_PB2_FUNC_GPIO>;
+ bias-disable;
+ drive-push-pull;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+};

Same. Note that if you have 2 configuration for one feature (like it is here
for "usbotg_pwren_h"), you could index it. Not that I'm adding a dedidacted
pinctroller for stm32f469.

Sorry, but I dont know what you mean by index here.
The usbotg_pwren_h (VBUS ENABLE) is attached in different port/pins
for each board.

Br.,


Br
Alex