Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86: Verify access_ok() context

From: David Smith
Date: Wed Jan 18 2017 - 17:17:23 EST


On 01/16/2017 03:14 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, David Smith wrote:
>
>> If you call access_ok() with page faulting disabled, you'll still see
>> this new warning.
>
> And how so? It's just checking for task context. page fault disable/enable
> has absolutely nothing to do with that.

True, task context and page fault disable/enable have nothing to do with each other. However, the access_ok() comment states:

* Context: User context only. This function may sleep if pagefaults are
* enabled.

That seems to indicate that the function won't sleep if pagefaults are disabled, and thus there is no need for a CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP warning if pagefaults are disabled.

>> If you put that new access_ok() call in a module that gets
>> loaded/unloaded, you see one warning for every module load, which gets a
>> bit annoying.
>
> Can you please elaborate where this access_ok() is placed in the module
> code?

It doesn't really matter where you place the access_ok() call in the module code. If you call access_ok() in a module, then that module has its own WARN_ON_ONCE() static variable. If access_ok() was a function exported from the kernel, then there would be only one copy of the WARN_ON_ONCE() static variable.

--
David Smith
dsmith@xxxxxxxxxx
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)