Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86/fpu: Simplify fpu->fpregs_active use

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Thu Jan 26 2017 - 11:31:43 EST


On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The fpregs_active() inline function is pretty pointless - in almost
> all the callsites it can be replaced with a direct fpu->fpregs_active
> access.
>
> Do so and eliminate the extra layer of obfuscation.

Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>