Re: v4.10-rc4 to v4.10-rc5: battery regression on Nokia N900

[Guenter Roeck]

On 01/27/2017 03:09 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > If this is the case, you'd better set
> > > (struct thermal_zone_params)->no_hwmon when registering the thermal
> > > zone device, in which case, the hwmon device will not be created.
> > >
> > > In fact, I'd prefer to change tzp->no_hwmon to tzp->hwmon to not create
> > > hwmon I/F by default, and see if there is anyone using it. If yes, we
> > > can set the flag in soc thermal driver, explicitly, at meantime, a
> > > hwmon compatible name is required.
> > >
> > > But one foreseeable result is that we may get bug reports from end user
> > > that some sensors (acpitz, etc) are gone in 'sensors' output. And TBH,
> > > I'm not quite sure if this can be counted as a regression or not.
> >
> > That sounds like fun. Changing bq27200-0 to bq27200_0 is Forbidden by
> > the ABI Police, but taking the entire device away is ok.
>
> Stop trying to break other people's systems. Thanks you.
You still have not shown that it does. Actually, I am trying to _fix_
other people's systems (those using libsensors).

Guenter