Re: [PATCH] eeprom/at24: use device_property_*() functions instead of of_get_property()

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Wed Feb 08 2017 - 19:08:19 EST


On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Ben Gardner <gardner.ben@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Allow the at24 driver to get configuration information from both OF and
> ACPI by using the more generic device_property functions.
> This change was inspired by the at25.c driver.
>
> I have a custom board with a ST M24C02 EEPROM attached to an I2C bus.
> With the following ACPI construct, this patch instantiates a working
> instance of the driver.
>
> Device (EEP0) {
> Name (_HID, "PRP0001")
> Name (_DSD, Package () {
> ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> Package () {
> Package () {"compatible", Package () {"st,24c02"}},
> Package () {"size", 256},
> Package () {"pagesize", 16},
> },
> })
> Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () {
> I2cSerialBus (
> 0x0057, ControllerInitiated, 400000,
> AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C3", 0x00,
> ResourceConsumer,,)
> })
> }
>
> Note: Matching the driver to the I2C device requires another patch.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg71914.html

Nice!

Few comments, after addressing them

FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>


>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Gardner <gardner.ben@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 28 +++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> index 051b147..9cb8904 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> #include <linux/log2.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> -#include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> #include <linux/nvmem-provider.h>
> @@ -562,26 +561,17 @@ static int at24_write(void *priv, unsigned int off, void *val, size_t count)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> -static void at24_get_ofdata(struct i2c_client *client,
> +static void at24_fw_to_chip(struct device *dev,
> struct at24_platform_data *chip)

"fw" here is ambiguous a bit.
Would at24_get_pdata() work for you?

> {
> - const __be32 *val;
> - struct device_node *node = client->dev.of_node;
> -
> - if (node) {
> - if (of_get_property(node, "read-only", NULL))
> - chip->flags |= AT24_FLAG_READONLY;
> - val = of_get_property(node, "pagesize", NULL);
> - if (val)
> - chip->page_size = be32_to_cpup(val);
> - }
> + u32 val;
> +
> + if (device_property_present(dev, "read-only"))
> + chip->flags |= AT24_FLAG_READONLY;
> +

> + if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "pagesize", &val) == 0)

I would use default from probe here.

int ret;

...

ret = ..._u32(..., &val);
if (ret) {
/* ...long comment from ->probe()... */
chip->page_size = 1;
} else
chip->page_size = val;


> + chip->page_size = val;
> }
> -#else
> -static void at24_get_ofdata(struct i2c_client *client,
> - struct at24_platform_data *chip)
> -{ }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
>
> static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> {
> @@ -621,7 +611,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> chip.page_size = 1;
>

> /* update chipdata if OF is present */

This is now redundant.

> - at24_get_ofdata(client, &chip);
> + at24_fw_to_chip(&client->dev, &chip);
>
> chip.setup = NULL;
> chip.context = NULL;
> --
> 2.7.4
>



--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko