Re: [PATCH 0/2] efi: Enhance capsule loader to support signed Quark images
From: Bryan O'Donoghue
Date: Fri Feb 17 2017 - 06:42:42 EST
On 17/02/17 10:14, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-02-17 10:51, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 17/02/17 08:23, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
>>> And to have UEFI expand
>>> it capsule support and take in signed binary would be a more secured way.
>>> So, influencing UEFI community to have such support would be the right
>>> move throughout the discussion. That is my summary.
>> CSH stands for "Clanton Secure Header" - Clanton being the internal
>> code-name for Quark X1000 prior to release.
>> There is no chance the UEFI standard (which can be used on ARM and
>> potentially other architectures) will accept a SoC specific
>> route-of-trust prepended header.
>> Sure some kind of binary signed headers might become part of the
>> standard eventually but, definitely _not_ a CSH.
>> The fact is CSH exists in the real-world and a UEFI firmware supports
>> accepting the CSH/UEFI-capsule pair for updating itself.
>> I think a far more practical solution is to accommodate the defacto
>> implementation (the only ? current implementation). To me it defies
>> reason to have Quark X1000 be the only system (that I know of) capable
>> of doing a capsule update - have capsule code in the kernel - but _not_
>> support the header prepended to that capsule that the Quark
>> firmware/bootrom require.
>> Right now the capsule code is dead code on Quark x1000. Let's do the
>> right thing and make it usable. I fully support having a
>> separate/parallel conversation with the UEFI body but, I'd be amazed if
>> the "Clanton Secure Header" made it into the standard...
> To be precise, CSH is only required on X102x. The X100x SoCs, those are
> also found on the Galileo Gen2 maker board, do not support secure boot
> and do not use the header.
The CSH is supported on the non-secure SoCs - the BSP on Gen1 certainly did.
- > QuarkPlatformPkg/Platform/Dxe/PlatformInit/DxeCapsuleSecurity.c
Looks like it will tolerate a lack of CSH but, obviously that's no
solution for the secure boot parts.
> IIRC, there used to be an eval system with
> the X1020 as well, but I think it's no longer available.
> Interestingly, the capsule file found in Intel's Galileo firmware update
> package  contains the CSH header. But I only succeeded flashing it on
> a Gen2 by removing the header first.
Hmm - the out of the box firmware will accept capsules from the website.
Gen1 and Gen2 should be the same in that respect - if you use the BSP
You should validate the out-of-the-box capsule update - with the kernel
on SPI flash works with the CSH in place.
Next step then is to get it working on tip-of-tree.
I have one Gen1 left (which I won't be experimenting with) - and I think
one Gen2 (which I don't especially mind blowing up).
Let's take the time to validate (or repudiate)
1. Out of the box BSP works with CSH capsules in place
2. New tip-of-tree addition supports CSH capsules
Stripping the CSH shouldn't be necessary (and breaks the secure boot