Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] arm64: dts: Add basic DT to support Spreadtrum's SP9860G
From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Thu Feb 23 2017 - 06:03:45 EST
On 23/02/17 06:20, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>>> I noticed Juno use the 2), would you suggest that way?
>> It is better to describe the HW component themselves rather than where
>> they are in the topology - the address of the component will make sure
>> the names are unique. So just the component type (etm, funnel,
>> replicator, ....) and the address they are located at.
> OK. And to avoid making other person confused in the future, is it
> better to revise juno-base.dtsi according to this convention?
Yes, it was noticed by Olof and should be now fixed for v4.11(already
queued). You can check linux-next if you want to have a look before it