Re: [patch 2/3] KVM: x86: introduce ioctl to allow frequency hypercalls
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Thu Feb 23 2017 - 12:31:38 EST
On 23/02/2017 17:48, Radim Krcmar wrote:
> Doing it manually doesn't sound useful outside of testing ...
> is DPDK actually being used "dynamically"?
> (I thought that the setup is decided when the host boots.)
Or at the very least when the guest boots. I agree that KVM_ENABLE_CAP
is enough. However, changing KVM_CPUID_FEATURES should be handled by
userspace (KVM doesn't know about 0x400000xx leaves at all).