Re: [PATCHv3 4/4] Changing alignment and indentation in function prototypes so parameters line up to make checkpatch happy (no more warnings/errors).

From: Sergei Shtylyov
Date: Mon Feb 27 2017 - 04:52:13 EST

Next message: Vincent Guittot: "Re: [LKP] [lkp-developer] [sched/fair] 4e5160766f: +149% ftq.noise.50% regression"
Previous message: Mikko Perttunen: "Re: [PATCH 4/7] net: stmmac: Parse FIFO sizes from feature registers"
In reply to: Matthew Giassa: "[PATCHv3 4/4] Changing alignment and indentation in function prototypes so parameters line up to make checkpatch happy (no more warnings/errors)."
Next in thread: Tobin C. Harding: "Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] Encasing macros with complex values (ie: base value plus index) with parentheses."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello!

Your subject is too long, mught want to move i(part of) it to the patch description...
And you need to provide your Signed-off-by:, the patch can't be applied without it.

MBR, Sergei

Next message: Vincent Guittot: "Re: [LKP] [lkp-developer] [sched/fair] 4e5160766f: +149% ftq.noise.50% regression"
Previous message: Mikko Perttunen: "Re: [PATCH 4/7] net: stmmac: Parse FIFO sizes from feature registers"
In reply to: Matthew Giassa: "[PATCHv3 4/4] Changing alignment and indentation in function prototypes so parameters line up to make checkpatch happy (no more warnings/errors)."
Next in thread: Tobin C. Harding: "Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] Encasing macros with complex values (ie: base value plus index) with parentheses."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]