Re: v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Thu Mar 09 2017 - 07:16:24 EST
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu 2017-03-09 10:38:46, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Well, I have fast CPUs, but most of the time they just compile
>> > stuff. Especially bisect is compile-heavy. I suspect going back to
>> > gcc-3.2 would bring me bigger advantages than CPU upgrade...
>> I hope you do use ccache or distcc?
> I tried to use distcc before, but it was rather hard to maintain. No
> ccache here. Hmm. I guess ccache really makes sense for bisect.
Yes it does. So if you're not using it yet, do the below, today, not tomorrow.
If your distro supports it, prepend /usr/lib/ccache/ to your $PATH.
Create symlinks from the names of your favorite cross-compilers
to /usr/bin/ccache, and make sure they are early in your $PATH.
That's it! Enjoy!
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds