Re: [PATCH] usb: Make sure usb/phy/of gets built-in

From: Alexey Brodkin
Date: Mon Apr 24 2017 - 08:45:05 EST


Hello,

On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 12:23 +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hello Frank,
>
> On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 20:15 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >
> > On 04/13/17 05:33, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > DWC3 driver uses of_usb_get_phy_mode() which is
> > > implemented in drivers/usb/phy/of.c and in bare minimal
> > > configuration it might not be pulled in kernel binary.
> > >
> > > In case of ARC or ARM this could be easily reproduced with
> > > "allnodefconfig" +CONFIG_USB=m +CONFIG_USB_DWC3=m.
> > >
> > > On building all ends-up with:
> > > ---------------------->8------------------
> > > Â Kernel: arch/arm/boot/Image is ready
> > > Â Kernel: arch/arm/boot/zImage is ready
> > > Â Building modules, stage 2.
> > > Â MODPOST 5 modules
> > > ERROR: "of_usb_get_phy_mode" [drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3.ko] undefined!
> > > make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
> > > make: *** [modules] Error 2
> > > ---------------------->8------------------
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > ---
> > > Âdrivers/Makefile | 1 +
> > > Â1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/Makefile b/drivers/Makefile
> > > index 2eced9afba53..8f8bdc9e3d29 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/Makefile
> > > @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_USB_PHY) += usb/
> > > Âobj-$(CONFIG_USB) += usb/
> > > Âobj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += usb/
> > > Âobj-$(CONFIG_USB_GADGET) += usb/
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_OF) += usb/
> >
> > Would CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT make more sense? (And does it work?)
>
> Well I'm not really sure here.
>
> The problem was in missing "drivers/usb/phy/of.o" in "drivers/usb/built-in.o".
> So I took a look at how components get enabled and saw quite mixed stuff.
>
> In "drivers/usb/phy/Makefile" we see:
> ------------------------->8---------------------------
> obj-$(CONFIG_OF)ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ+= of.o
> ------------------------->8---------------------------
>
> In "drivers/usb/Makefile" we see:
> ------------------------->8---------------------------
> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT)ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ+= phy/
> ------------------------->8---------------------------
>
> From above I may conclude that your proposal should work as well
> but it's more a question of which approach is safer and more future proof.
>
> Maybe it even worth adding the following to "drivers/usb/Makefile":
> ------------------------->8---------------------------
> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT)ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ+= phy/
> ------------------------->8---------------------------

I'm wondering if there're any other thoughts on this one?
The patch fixes a real problem and it would be good to get this or similar
fix upstream.

-Alexey