Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: fourcc byteorder: drop DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN
From: Michel DÃnzer
Date: Tue May 02 2017 - 23:05:39 EST
On 03/05/17 12:06 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Removing the definition also removes the possibility to describe a lot
>> of pixel formats, so that should definitely be mentioned. I think it
>> would also be good to have some kind of justified claim that no
>> hardware actually needs the pixel formats this is removing (e.g. RGB565
> That and RGB2101010 BE are the only candidates I can think of.
> Dealing with those in none-native byteorder is a PITA though. Display
> hardware is little endian (pci byte order) for quite a while already.
Maybe by default, but not exclusively.
> radeon looks differently on pre-R600 and R600+ hardware.
> pre-R600 can byteswap on cpu access, so the cpu view is bigendian
> whereas things are actually stored on little endian byte order.
> Hardware supports both 16bit and 32bit swaps. Used for fbdev emulation
> (probably 32bit swaps, but not fully sure).
32-bit swaps for 32 bpp, 16-bit swaps for 16 bpp.
> R600+ supports bigendian framebuffer formats, so no byteswapping on
> access is needed. Not sure whenever that includes 16bpp formats or
> whenever this is limited to the 8 bit-per-color formats [...]
It includes 16bpp. Looking at
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crtc.c:dce4_crtc_do_set_base(), it sets
up byte-swapping for all multi-byte formats, so it effectively treats
all those formats as if they had DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN set.
If the radeon (and amdgpu) driver were to be changed to use
drm_mode_legacy_fb_format_he for >= R600, that must also handle 16 bpp,
which requires DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN. So I still don't see how that can
be removed or even deprecated.
>From Ilia's followup it sounds like there's a similar situation with
Earthling Michel DÃnzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer