Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it
From: Javier Martinez Canillas
Date: Fri May 05 2017 - 06:40:11 EST
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> thanks for the series.
>> > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches
>> > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I
>> > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree.
>> From my POV, patches 2-5 should be applied to the same tree. Since all
Yes, I didn't mention 5 because is just a documentation change. But it
would be better if is merged together with 2-4 indeed.
>> I2C related patches have my tag, I assume they will be picked up by MFD.
>> Lee, let me know if you prefer differently.
> I can pick them up, no problem. Can the ARM patches be taking
> independently? I'm guessing they can since they are separate from one
That's corect. The only platform changes that can't be picked
independently from MFD are the ones in patch 2, but tha's why I added
in the same patch. The OMAP folks (Tony and Aaro) already acked so you
can pick it.