Re: [PATCH 2/3] livepatch/rcu: Warn when system consistency is broken in RCU code

[Josh Poimboeuf]

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 02:07:54PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:43:33PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:15:58PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 02:47:29PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:13:22PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > 
> > > [ . . . ]
> > > 
> > > > > If rcu is not watching, calling rcu_enter_irq() will have it watch
> > > > > again. Even in NMI context I believe.
> > > > 
> > > > What if you get an NMI while running in rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter() before
> > > > it increments rdtp->dynticks?  Will rcu_enter_irq() still work from the
> > >                                       rcu_irq_enter()
> > > > NMI?
> > > 
> > > The rcu_nmi_enter() function willl notice that RCU is not watching, and
> > > will therefore atomically increment RCU's dynticks-idle counter, which
> > > will be atomically incremented again upon return.  Since the bottom bit
> > > of this counter controls whether or not RCU is watching, RCU will be
> > > watching during the NMI, will stop watching upon return from the NMI,
> > > which restores state so as to allow rcu_irq_enter() to cause RCU to once
> > > again watch.  (NMI algorithm due to Andy Lutomirski.)
> > > 
> > > > I'm just trying to understand what are the cases where rcu_enter_irq()
> > > > *doesn't* work from an ftrace handler.
> > > 
> > > It doesn't work from an NMI handler.  Aside from possible architecture
> > > specific special cases, it should work everywhere else.
> > 
> > Ok, so just to clarify.  Is there a bug in the ftrace stack tracer in
> > the following situation?
> > 
> > 1. RCU isn't watching
> > 2. An NMI hits
> > 3. ist_enter() calls into the ftrace stack tracer, before
> >    rcu_nmi_enter() is called, so RCU isn't watching yet
> > 4. The ftrace stack tracer calls rcu_irq_enter(), which has no effect,
> >    so RCU still isn't watching
> > 5. Hilarity ensues in the ftrace stack tracer
> 
> This would be a problem if step 2's NMI hit rcu_irq_enter(),
> rcu_irq_exit(), and friends in just the wrong place.
> 
> I would suggest that ftrace() do something like this...
> 
> 	if (in_nmi())
> 		rcu_nmi_enter();
> 	else
> 		rcu_irq_enter();
> 
> Except that, as Steven will quickly point out, this won't work at the
> very edges of the NMI, when NMI_MASK won't be set in preempt_count().
> 
> Other thoughts?

Ok.  So I think the livepatch ftrace handler would need the in_nmi()
check, in case it's called early in the NMI.

But on x86, rcu_nmi_enter() is also called in some non-NMI exception
cases, from ist_enter().  So it appears that the in_nmi() check wouldn't
be sufficient.  We might instead need something like:

	if (in_nmi() || in_some_other_exception())
		rcu_nmi_enter();
	else
		rcu_irq_enter();

But unfortunately the in_some_other_exception() function doesn't
currently exist.

So, one more question.  Would it work if we just always called
rcu_nmi_enter()?

-- 
Josh