Re: [PATCH v1] samples/bpf: Add a .gitignore for binaries

From: David Ahern
Date: Tue May 16 2017 - 19:28:10 EST


On 5/13/17 3:30 AM, MickaÃl SalaÃn wrote:
>
> On 13/02/2017 02:43, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 2/12/17 2:23 PM, MickaÃl SalaÃn wrote:
>>> diff --git a/samples/bpf/.gitignore b/samples/bpf/.gitignore
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..a7562a5ef4c2
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/samples/bpf/.gitignore
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
>>> +fds_example
>>> +lathist
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Listing each target is going to be a PITA to maintain. It would be
>> better to put targets into a build directory (bin?) and ignore the
>> directory.
>>
>
> It would require a lot of modifications to the Makefile and more
> complexity. It seems much more simple for everyone to stick to a simple
> gitignore file easily maintainable:
> $ awk '$1 == "hostprogs-y" { print $3 }' < Makefile > .gitignore
>
> Alexei, Daniel, what do you think about this? Do you want me to send a
> v2 with the new tests?
>

The problem stems from the fact that bpf samples do not really fall into
the 'hostprogs' category (see "4 Host Program support" in
Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt). Fixing samples/bpf to not rely on
it is the better long term solution. Building of tools/ for example does
not rely on it so there is an existing example of leveraging kernel
headers without the overhead.