Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

[Kalle Valo]

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' used but never defined
>>  static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>>            ^
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h:262:13:
>> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_write' used but never defined
>>  static void rt2800_bbp_write(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>>              ^
>>   CC [M]
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800pci.o
>> In file included from
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c:43:0:
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h:259:11:
>> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' declared 'static' but never defined
>> [-Wunused-function]
>>  static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>>            ^
>
> On which base version did you apply my patches? There may be a conflict
> against patches that are in your tree but not yet in linux-next, as I don't see
> the warning and also see no reference to rt2800_bbp_read in rt2800lib.h

I did a test build with current wireless-drivers-next and I also don't
see any warnings.

-- 
Kalle Valo