Re: [PATCH 11/30] kprobes.txt: standardize document format

From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Fri May 19 2017 - 10:38:54 EST


On Thu, 18 May 2017 22:24:03 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Each text file under Documentation follows a different
> format. Some doesn't even have titles!
>
> Change its representation to follow the adopted standard,
> using ReST markups for it to be parseable by Sphinx:
>
> - comment the contents;
> - add proper markups for titles;
> - mark literal blocks as such;
> - use :Author: for authorship;
> - use the right markups for footnotes;
> - escape some literals that would otherwise cause problems;
> - fix identation and add blank lines where needed.

OK, it seems good to me.

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>

By the way, there are some words which referes other section
in this document, should it also be updated according to
Sphinx format?

e.g.
[snip]
> @@ -53,7 +59,8 @@ a post_handler, and how to use the maxactive and nmissed fields of
> a kretprobe. But if you're in a hurry to start using Kprobes, you
> can skip ahead to section 2.

here, it refers "section 2".

Thank you,


--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>