Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] net: macb: Add hardware PTP support

From: Richard Cochran
Date: Tue Jun 06 2017 - 14:36:43 EST

Next message: Fabio Estevam: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: imx: Add MXC_CPU_IMX6ULL and cpu_is_imx6ull"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH RT V2] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious lock wakeup"
In reply to: Rafal Ozieblo: "RE: [PATCH v2 4/4] net: macb: Add hardware PTP support"
Next in thread: Richard Cochran: "Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] net: macb: Add hardware PTP support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 08:54:50AM +0000, Rafal Ozieblo wrote:
> Would "ENOTSUP" be sufficient ?

You mean EOPNOTSUPP? Yes, sounds ok to me. EFAULT is surely wrong.

Thanks,
Richard

Next message: Fabio Estevam: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: imx: Add MXC_CPU_IMX6ULL and cpu_is_imx6ull"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [PATCH RT V2] sched: Prevent task state corruption by spurious lock wakeup"
In reply to: Rafal Ozieblo: "RE: [PATCH v2 4/4] net: macb: Add hardware PTP support"
Next in thread: Richard Cochran: "Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] net: macb: Add hardware PTP support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]