Re: [PATCH linux-next v4 4/4] spi: imx: Add support for SPI Slave mode

From: Jiada Wang
Date: Wed Jun 07 2017 - 04:51:47 EST


Hi Sascha

On 06/07/2017 01:41 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 12:38:09PM +0900, Jiada Wang wrote:
Previously i.MX SPI controller only works in Master mode.
This patch adds support to i.MX51, i.MX53 and i.MX6 ECSPI
controller to work also in Slave mode.

Currently SPI Slave mode support patch has the following limitations:
1. The stale data in RXFIFO will be dropped when the Slave does any new
transfer.
2. One transfer can be finished only after all transfer->len data been
transferred to master device
3. Slave device only accepts transfer->len data. Any data longer than this
from master device will be dropped. Any data shorter than this from
master will cause SPI to stuck due to mentioned HW limitation 2.
4. Only PIO transfer is supported in Slave mode.

Following HW limitation applies:
1. ECSPI has a HW issue when works in Slave mode, after 64
words written to TXFIFO, even TXFIFO becomes empty,
ECSPI_TXDATA keeps shift out the last word data,
so we have to disable ECSPI when in slave mode after the
transfer completes
2. Due to Freescale errata ERR003775 "eCSPI: Burst completion by Chip
Select (SS) signal in Slave mode is not functional" burst size must
be set exactly to the size of the transfer. This limit SPI transaction
with maximum 2^12 bits. This errata affects i.MX53 and i.MX6 ECSPI
controllers.

Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang<jiada_wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 228 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 198 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
index 5034f89..3db3809 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
@@ -53,9 +53,13 @@
/* generic defines to abstract from the different register layouts */
#define MXC_INT_RR (1<< 0) /* Receive data ready interrupt */
#define MXC_INT_TE (1<< 1) /* Transmit FIFO empty interrupt */
+#define MXC_INT_RDR BIT(4) /* Receive date threshold interrupt */

/* The maximum bytes that a sdma BD can transfer.*/
#define MAX_SDMA_BD_BYTES (1<< 15)
+/* The maximum bytes that IMX53_ECSPI can transfer in slave mode.*/
+#define MX53_MAX_TRANSFER_BYTES 512
+
struct spi_imx_config {
unsigned int speed_hz;
unsigned int bpw;
@@ -79,7 +83,9 @@ struct spi_imx_devtype_data {
void (*trigger)(struct spi_imx_data *);
int (*rx_available)(struct spi_imx_data *);
void (*reset)(struct spi_imx_data *);
+ void (*disable)(struct spi_imx_data *);
bool has_dmamode;
+ bool has_slavemode;
unsigned int fifo_size;
enum spi_imx_devtype devtype;
};
@@ -107,6 +113,11 @@ struct spi_imx_data {
const void *tx_buf;
unsigned int txfifo; /* number of words pushed in tx FIFO */

+ /* Slave mode */
+ bool slave_mode;
+ bool slave_aborted;
+ unsigned int slave_burst;
+
/* DMA */
bool usedma;
u32 wml;
@@ -223,6 +234,9 @@ static bool spi_imx_can_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi,
if (!transfer)
return false;

+ if (spi_imx->slave_mode)
+ return false;
+
bpw = transfer->bits_per_word;
if (!bpw)
bpw = spi->bits_per_word;
@@ -266,6 +280,7 @@ static bool spi_imx_can_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi,
#define MX51_ECSPI_INT 0x10
#define MX51_ECSPI_INT_TEEN (1<< 0)
#define MX51_ECSPI_INT_RREN (1<< 3)
+#define MX51_ECSPI_INT_RDREN (1<< 4)

#define MX51_ECSPI_DMA 0x14
#define MX51_ECSPI_DMA_TX_WML(wml) ((wml)& 0x3f)
@@ -282,6 +297,46 @@ static bool spi_imx_can_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi,
#define MX51_ECSPI_TESTREG 0x20
#define MX51_ECSPI_TESTREG_LBC BIT(31)

+static void mx53_ecspi_rx_slave(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx)
+{
+ u32 val = be32_to_cpu(readl(spi_imx->base + MXC_CSPIRXDATA));
+
+ if (spi_imx->rx_buf) {
+ int n_bytes = spi_imx->slave_burst % sizeof(val);
+
+ if (n_bytes) {
+ memcpy(spi_imx->rx_buf,
+ ((u8 *)&val) + sizeof(val) - n_bytes, n_bytes);
+ } else {
+ *((u32 *)spi_imx->rx_buf) = val;
+ n_bytes = sizeof(val);
+ }
+
+ spi_imx->rx_buf += n_bytes;
+ spi_imx->slave_burst -= n_bytes;
+ }
+}
You can do the same optimization you have done for mx53_ecspi_tx_slave()
for mx53_ecspi_rx_slave() aswell.

Otherwise the patch looks fine to me now.
I will submit updated patch set after rebase to have your latest change
to spi-imx.

Thanks,
Jiada


Sascha