Re: [PATCH 2/2] include: warn for inconsistent endian config definition

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Fri Jun 09 2017 - 03:06:07 EST


On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Display warning if CPU_BIG_ENDIAN is not defined on big endian
> architecture and also warn if it defined on little endian architectures.
>
> We have seen some generic code(for example code include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h)
> uses CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN to decide the endianess.

That example is IMHO the least harmful, as qrwlock must be selected explicitly
by the architecture.

The uses in

drivers/of/base.c
drivers/of/fdt.c
drivers/tty/serial/earlycon.c
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c

are more dangerous, and may have bitten people already.
In addition, people may have worked around them in DT, so this series may
actually introduce regressions.

> Here is the original discussion
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg178101.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

Hmm, the link above refers to a mail from me? ;-)

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds