Re: [PATCH 2/2] include: warn for inconsistent endian config definition

[Babu Moger]

On 6/9/2017 9:11 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 6/9/2017 2:16 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Here is the original discussion
> > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg178101.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > Yes. Got it.  So patch #1 is fine.   But, patch #2 might cause regressions.
> > Should I drop patch 2.
> No, it should be applied, and regressions should be fixed.

Geert,  Ok. Sure. I will resubmit the patch mentioning all the 
files(base.c, fdt.c etc..) that are affected by this change.
thanks
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                          Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                  -- Linus Torvalds